For all
intents and purposes—a phrase that all-too-often diminishes the mystery of
‘all’—the press conference was over, the podium emptying of its various
speakers. The renowned poet J. Hiram Peacock had died sometime during the night—his
body found at the base of a cliff that sunshine couldn’t reveal until mid-morning,
and now it was early afternoon. The tide had almost buried him, which might
have been the way he wanted it. But people cared about J. Hiram—look how many
came at such short notice—and there was no way he’d just slip away, unnoticed. How he slipped—that was what this
presser was all about.
The sheriff
had to front the questions, though he often pointed to the deputy coroner and
the DNR representative to provide details about the body and the circumstances.
“We cannot inform much more,” each said, “as the investigation is on-going.” Indeed,
they had hardly transferred the corpse to the morgue when the need had become
apparent—through helicopter footage and a million social media shares
already—to at least give something of an explanation, even if there was little
more to say than
·
he’d been walking his dog
·
the weather was, as you know, calm—and moonlit
·
the promontory above where he fell had no fence
·
the dog, still leashed, made his way back home
·
there was nobody else at home, and no evidence
of foul play
·
there was no note—nothing revealing a deliberate
act
·
the body, as we have said, was half-submerged
when found
·
we’re not revealing who it was who found him
·
we’ll reconvene again this time tomorrow—or
earlier, if fate sees fit.
It was an
odd way to end—if fate sees fit, as
if the Wizard of Oz were part of the consultancy. Others who had spoken,
assembled on the fly, included a neighbor more or less disconsolate, an agent
of the publishing house that owned the rights to much of Peacock’s works, and a
colleague at the university he sometimes graced—if also cursed.
“Yes, of
course it’s a loss,” the colleague said during Q&A, “which is immeasurable.
What can one say? He’d written—well, not everything,
but—so much that is now in the parlance of not only philologists, but the
common reader, who could quote him at a moment’s notice…”
“Can you
give us an example?”
“Um,”
sighing in some disbelief, “sure… it’s best seen written out, but you can hear
his power in the lines:
‘ours
were not the hours that bound us
but
the second chances of infinity.’
That, and more concretely—”
“You can
find a complete collection of quotables from our website,” the publisher
announced, disinclined to give away the gems for free.
“Business”,
the colleague lamented, “is never what a poet wants to leave as legacy.”
“So what
will be his legacy, from an academic point of view?”
“Academic?
I know him as an artist—or”, swallowing the thought, “… knew him… I’m
sorry—this is all so sudden—”
“Of
course,” the questioner understood, putting up a palm to apologize.
“But,” the
colleague began again, “I can try….” The publisher and the sheriff loomed in the
background, gauging when responses went too far. The colleague, for her part,
decided on these lines: “art itself is legacy, and art that spurs on other art
is—not to be redundant—immeasurable. I was talking to him just the other day—”
“Where?
When exactly?” another journalist pressed for details.
“Well, just
a matter of speaking—it doesn’t pertain to how he died—”
“How would
you know?”
“Of course
I can’t know. So maybe I’ll say no more.”
“Probably
the best course forward,” stepped in the publisher, “so, again, our website
is—”
“No, no—,”
broke in the second journalist, “I didn’t mean to stop you. Please go
on—talking to him just the other day…”
The colleague
weighed the moment, an ear on the remonstration and encouragement equally. “I
asked him if poetry would survive the century, and if so, in what form…”
The
publisher shouldered toward the microphone. “That’s the credo of our company—Dr
Peacock would affirm—to usher fine literature from generation to generation, as
Shakespeare did for Milton, who did for Dryden, who did for—”
“But it was
curious how he answered it,” the colleague continued, gathering strength in the
recall. “He brushed his hand through the notion of this century and had me
imagine New Year’s Day, 2025—seven years from now. I said, ‘ok—that’s not too
hard.’” She itemized through unclenched fingers: “‘different president, for
sure; harsher hurricanes, probably; handsets obsolete, perhaps, traded for
wearables, Dick Tracy watches—that kind of thing.’ He listened to these obvious
considerations. But then he said this: ‘In seven years, everyone on earth will
change significantly—usually through relations—yet everyone will essentially
remain the same—usually through relations.’”
Reporters
scribbled in short-hand, as if a video review wouldn’t catch things right. One
asked if the poet meant to say that twice, “about relations,” to which the
colleague simply nodded. The sheriff considered that point as good as any cue
to wrap this conference up—there had been no mandate on entertaining questions
in the first place. Yet as he cleared his throat to repeat ‘again, this time
tomorrow,’ another question from the press could not be stifled: “Did he speak
beyond those seven years, like the century you initially proposed?”
The
colleague looked at the sheriff, who blushed and backed away. The publisher
inched forward, yet knew the rostrum didn’t want him anymore. “Did he speak
beyond 2025?” the colleague repeated; “he did—beyond this century. It’s fitting
that we’ve had Shakespeare referenced today, as more than four centuries have
transpired since Hamlet, Isabella, Othello, the Fool, Anthony and Cleopatra
broke the fourth wall, basically, of theatre. What’s changed since then? Our
institutions have, technology certainly, notions of an ‘undiscovered country’,
Caliban to Taliban—if not our understanding of either of those names.” There
were puzzled looks about whose words these were—hers, or Dr Peacock’s. She read
them and clarified, “characters like these were always in our conversations, as
they’ve been for centuries. Our job is to add to the cast, beyond the average
Jedi—to be a Shakespeare for an audience four hundred years from now.”
“So he felt
he was the Shakespeare of our age?”
“A Shakespeare. Virginia Woolf has much
to say on this theme.”
On that
note, for some reason, the sheriff called it quits. The publisher caught the
colleague’s arm for some whispered words, and then one of the journalists did
the same. “You’ll be here tomorrow?” the latter asked. Against the glare of the
sheriff, the colleague shrugged a ‘possibly’. “If so, could you say more about
seven years turning into centuries? Just… even off the record, if…”
“I’ll sleep
on it, God granting any sleep tonight.”
The next
day offered little news, and just the sheriff took the stage to say where
things were with Dr Peacock—or (he corrected) the investigation of his death.
“It’s ongoing,” was his blanket statement, thereby little could be gained by
Q&A, but “those who want to speak about his works or legacy”—the sheriff
panned generally toward those who’d spoken yesterday—“will have that chance, if
not expressly from this podium. Our update, then, is thus:
·
still no evidence of foul play
·
his shirt, however, was torn from the left
underarm to the middle of his back
·
this tear could have happened during the fall,
or otherwise
·
the top of the cliff shows nothing abnormal
·
the tidal basin below the cliff remains
off-limits
·
the one who found him prefers not to be
identified
·
that finder never touched him—the lack of
footprints bear this out—and called emergency services that came within ten
minutes
·
the coroner’s report will not be issued before
the usual legal protocols
·
updates hereafter will not be scheduled, but
posted online.
And I’ll take just a few questions.”
“Is the dog
being cared for?”
“Yes.”
“By whom?”
“Confidential.”
“Confidential.”
“What do
you mean by ‘otherwise’ concerning the torn shirt?”
“Nothing more than it’s part of the ongoing investigation.”
“Nothing more than it’s part of the ongoing investigation.”
“Could
there be a person who tried to prevent his fall?”
“I cannot
speculate.”
“Or someone
he was fighting with?”
“Next? I’ll
allow two more.”
“Why are
you so tight-lipped?”
“Next. One
more.”
“Are you
looking at his poetry for clues?”
The sheriff
stared hard at that question. Reluctantly, knowing the ticking seconds showed a
flagging unresolve, he called up Peacock’s colleague from the wings, whispering
to her she had two minutes, max.
“Poetry, of
course,” she gathered her thoughts, “is generally inductive, not deductive;
Hiram liked to say ‘the emporium for evidence of anything is that it might exist’.
Not ‘must’, but ‘might’.”
“So…, does
that mean… his poems might hold some
clues?”
The colleague
shook her head a little, pulling a folded sheet of paper from her pocket with a
trembling hand. “Here’s a poem he gave me not so long ago—nothing that he’d
sent for publishing, as”—the publisher coughed to try to make her stop—“not all
poems are meant for that, but, revelatory or otherwise, here is what he wrote:
There are no arrant knaves out here
tonight—
my dog and I protect the greater
us from such—
so we’ll Quixote other lands
beyond our sight—
inventing faith for those who
doubt too much—
starting with ourselves, our ways
and means—
this world’s a top that’s spun
for all it’s worth—
from dradling, and fidgeting, to
slot machines—
thought is often thrown away,
like afterbirth—
and in its place are many manufactured
fears—
how to pay the rent, and smile
while doing so—
the question’s not so petty through
the years—
I wonder, with my dog, where
walks might go—
I’ll hold it up for photos if you’d like.” She clutched it
tenderly from the top.
“He typed
this up for you?”
“He gave it
to me typed.”
“Dashes at
the end like that? Is that typical of his style?”
The
colleague aimed her head at the publisher and said, “you might check the
website,” to muted laughs, “but Hiram wrote in various styles—‘many
manufacturings’, if I may paraphrase that line.”
“You’ve
called him ‘Hiram’ several times. Was that his preferred name?”
“He was self-conscious of all his names. The obvious line to draw is to ‘J. Alfred Prufrock’, and perhaps his parents knew they’d have to play with ‘Peacock’ somehow, so why not do so in homage to the great T.S. Eliot? The ‘J’ in that poem is never known, but Hiram’s first name, Japheth, was just something he didn’t care for.”
“He was self-conscious of all his names. The obvious line to draw is to ‘J. Alfred Prufrock’, and perhaps his parents knew they’d have to play with ‘Peacock’ somehow, so why not do so in homage to the great T.S. Eliot? The ‘J’ in that poem is never known, but Hiram’s first name, Japheth, was just something he didn’t care for.”
“I can see
why!”
“‘Hiram’
isn’t any more conventional, but yeah—he leaned toward that, or simply as ‘Hi’.”
“Like ‘Hi
and Lois’?” someone asked.
“Alright,”
the sheriff wrapped it up with that.
The
colleague stayed an hour, though, to share more lines from memory. The journalist
who had asked the day before how seven years turn into centuries rekindled the
question, not so satisfied that today’s quatrains sufficed. “Among the poems he
shared with me, the one I read out seemed pertinent to how he might have died,
walking Barney—”
“His dog,
yes?”
“Yes—and thinking, maybe absent-mindedly, about errant knights against the arrant knaves of this world. Admittedly, that doesn’t vault our present circumstances much—”
“Yes—and thinking, maybe absent-mindedly, about errant knights against the arrant knaves of this world. Admittedly, that doesn’t vault our present circumstances much—”
“And rather
implies a look backwards in time,” the publisher interrupted. “I think you
should be careful about platforming his work without expressed permission.”
“Whose?
His? Certainly not yours, in this instance.”
“In this
instance, the guardian of his estate. I know that isn’t you.”
“No one can
reclaim what another person freely gave. And we’re talking about ideas,
anyway.”
“Ideas have
copyright.”
“And
thoughts, and questions, and arguments, and conversations, and memories?—”
Some
journalists walked away from this, but the one hell-bent on Peacock’s long-view
of humanity pressed on: “I can’t shake yesterday from the notion of a
Shakespearean leap into the future. What would Hiram say about.., well, life in
the 25th century?”
The
colleague shot the publisher a glance that underscored free speculation. “He
knew there’d have to be enormous differences. World population could be
ten-fold or one-tenth that of today, depending on prosperity or pestilence.
Space will have opened up, so some of us would be out there—where we used to
say the heavens were. Biology will coincide with electromagnetic regulators,
blurring some sense of what is human and who is robot. But—as I represented
yesterday—Hiram was convinced about ‘relations’ as the common denominator of
any era. We will always need ourselves.”
“The reason
Major Tom is calling Ground Control?”
“And his
wife—‘I love her very much’—”
“—‘she knows’,” the journalist couldn’t
help but croon.
“Sounds
rather utopian,” another journalist wanted to determine.
The
colleague scrunched her lips on that word. Looking toward the publisher, she
decided to conclude, “if not utopian, also not its opposite. Go to the website
and browse that spectrum more.”
J. Hiram
Peacock lived alone for the latter half of his life, though always with a dog
or two, parakeets and smaller pets. A maid would come in once a week, friends
would visit on occasion, but few remembered how recently. His relatives
respected him, including his privacy, and, living on the other coast, their
tighter budgets had to wait for him to fly to them. He wasn’t active on social
media but participated on some professional blogs, none of his own making. His
publisher and agents—several over the years—met him at the university or in
their offices. Neighbors—like that one disconsolate—saw him often in his yard
and walking along the promontory. They liked him or, more likely, the idea of
having a poet in their midst.
Nothing of
the investigation held anything upon another cause than a ‘self-fall’,
accidental or otherwise. Results of blood toxicity showed nothing unusual; he
had eaten reasonably that evening. Searchers explored every crack of the
cliffside to try to procure that swath of shirt—the size and shape of a paper
airplane—and finally determined it must have gone out with the tide. The dog,
it was thought, could have ingested it, but the vet ruled that out in due time.
After a few
days, it was arranged that the dog would go to live with the colleague. The
latter was of two minds about it—never having owned a dog herself, yet well
aware that Barney, 14 human years old, could largely take care of himself. The
need for walks, though, gave her pause.… The last line of the poem she shared
would guilt her into the commitment.
One of the
detectives joined the veterinarian to settle Barney in. The colleague’s
apartment was modest—a connection of rooms that all looked like a professor’s
study, books and papers spread about like plants at a floral shop. She’d made a
special area in the hallway for the dog, yet led him all around to get the lay
of the land. Then she asked her visitors into the dining room for coffee. The
afternoon was in its homestretch—perhaps there’d be more work to do for all of
their offices, if times like this bridged work with greater cause.
“We’ve done
a thorough search of everything he owned—there may be items that you’d be
interested in, according to the guardian of the estate,” the detective said.
“Who is
that guardian?”
“It’s legally
undisclosed, but we have been granted rights to say, well, what I just did.”
“Are you
talking about his papers, letters?”
“Among
other things, yes. We’ve looked through things according to investigation
protocol, but have no interest in detaining them for those who’d value what
they hold more personally.”
“The
guardian agreed that you’d be ideal for the dog,” the vet seemed happy to add.
“How would
this guardian know?”
The vet and
detective shrugged, discretely. “The fact is,” the former admitted, “no one
else gave any indication of care for his well-being. I mean, in the abstract,
maybe, but…”
“From what
we understand,” the detective continued, “the dog is the only witness to
Peacock’s fall. Even ‘witness’ is not so accurate, as the leash and his being
outside the property is only circumstantial. Neighbors mostly didn’t know
Barney’s name—you did; no one outside the investigation called the
veterinarian’s office—you did every day.
“In the
brief time we’ve been here, Barney’s wagged his tail more than I knew was in
him,” the vet joined in. “He’s obviously comfortable with the conditions here.”
“I’ll
probably inundate you with questions when he’ll have the sniffles…”
“Sure,” the
detective answered for the vet, “and give us a call whenever you need.”
“You’re
very kind. I think, if Barney agrees, this will all work out. Barn? what’ya
say? Barney?”
The dog wandered in naturally at her call. His tail was wagging—consistent to his age and penchant. In his mouth was something he had found—securing ownership of his new environs, it seemed.
The dog wandered in naturally at her call. His tail was wagging—consistent to his age and penchant. In his mouth was something he had found—securing ownership of his new environs, it seemed.
“What’s
that, Barn?” the colleague asked, then cupped her mouth in recognition.
The
detective, noticing, also beckoned. “Barney, come here, boy,” and he
complied—not giving him the item, but letting the detective scritch his neck.
The vet
looked at the colleague, as if she were suddenly his client. “Have you seen
this before?”
Of course,
she had. Her eyes looked from it into Barney’s, reading his mind to discover
her own. The detective said nothing, letting the vet’s question linger. The
colleague also said nothing—the cloth speaking somewhat for itself. Barney lay
down, keeping his find close to his snout.
“You were
there that evening,” led the detective, still looking at the dog.
Barney, as
if in response, sighed the way dogs do.
“I was,”
the colleague softly confessed. She put out her hands, J-shaped, left atop
right, flinching. “From that afternoon, onward. I’m surprised you hadn’t found
his phone call to me—”
“We didn’t
find the call record unusual; it was typical that he’d call you or some other
colleague around that time of day—we don’t investigate routine things to an
intrusive degree.
“He said he
didn’t want to live anymore—you would have heard him imply that on the phone—”
“—again,
we—”
“—and he didn’t
want to think four hundred years from now when,.. when—”
She
stopped—not to cry, as was in the making, but to kneel down to share in
Barney’s find. The vet gestured to the detective to give them space, then
reminded her of the question: “when?”
Her sigh
resembled Barney’s. Then, “when eternity consumes the need to be present, as it
has.”
“You ate
dinner with him?” the detective measured.
“We talked
a lot. I brought over the poem about Quixote—that was mine, the only lie I told
to the press. I wanted him to enjoy ‘our ways and means’, among other things.”
“Were you
romantic with him?”
She kept
her eyes on the dog. “Does that matter, really?”
The
detective wasn’t sure. “No,” he decided for the moment. “Can you describe how
he fell?”
Now she
stretched to make her elbow a tripod to support her head for the memory. “He
gave me the leash—we’d been walking a half hour, not arguing but also not
enjoying the moonlight, which I kept on pointing to—it was a favorite motif of
his, the changing faces of the single side we see, the towboat of tides….
Barney was tired, whining to get home. Hiram asked me to do that for him—and I
said I wouldn’t, not without him, too.”
The vet
gently slid the triangle of cloth from Barney’s paws and regarded it himself
before handing it to the detective, who asked, “how did this tear happen? When
exactly?”
The
colleague studied the crooked fingers of her left hand. “He turned toward the
cliff and paced like I hadn’t seen before—not quite a run, but… a resolve. I
begged him to stop as I ran—Barney right beside—and he wouldn’t. So… I…
clutched what I could, and Barney seemed to understand, too, because he threw
his weight toward the safe side—aiming home—otherwise I would have tumbled over
the cliff, too. I thought his weight and my clutch could be enough.., but… the
fabric ripped and… he was gone.”
“Why didn’t
you report this right away?”
Good
question, her face showed. “I saw by moonlight the moment he crashed into the
tidal basin and I yelled and yelled for—I don’t know—minutes more than I knew a
rescue was possible. No one heard me? Really? None of the neighbors?”
“None,” the
detective straight-lined. “Or, like you, they didn’t come out to bear witness.”
“He was
dead. I didn’t know what to do. I wanted the ocean to wash him away.”
“Why did
you leave Barney out all night?” the vet implored.
“I let him
go—he ran the rim of the promontory and out of sight. I looked for him ’til the
moon went down and gave up. I came here and collapsed.”
“And put
yourself together for the press conference?”
“What else
could I do?”
“You could have said all this then! You could have told the truth!”
“You could have said all this then! You could have told the truth!”
“You could
have helped with Barney then,” the vet poured on.
She sank
fuller to the floor. “I could have let the facts define the man.”
“Yes,” insisted
the detective, “you made all this an unnecessary drama!”
The room assumed
the atmosphere of Prospero’s cell—or the ramparts outside it: “a turn or two I need to still my beating
mind,” the colleague said, “that is what Hiram needed. I’m not sure I
bought him time, but… the rest of us got that chance.”
The vet and
the detective regarded each other, wordlessly, and, in turn, stood up to figure
how the meeting might end. The detective went into the hallway to make a call,
muffled but overt enough in purpose. The vet returned to sit again. “Will you
be able to take responsibility of this dog?” he asked. “Or yourself, for that
matter?”
The colleague
sat back up and asked Barney, “are you ready for a walk?”
Barney
stood and wagged his tail, a welcome return to some routine and the shared need
for here and now.
Daniel Martin Vold
Lamken (2017)

No comments:
Post a Comment